US-based coins
146 coins #11 Page 3| | Coins | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| | 101 | | $ | +0.48% | |
| | 102 | | $ | -8.26% | |
| The coins below are ranked lower due to missing data. Learn more | |||||
| | 103 | | $ | -2.65% | |
| | 104 | | $ | -1.11% | |
| | 105 | | $ | -15.22% | |
| | 106 | | $ | -7.41% | |
| | 107 | | $ | +1.47% | |
| | 108 | | $ | +11.46% | |
| | 109 | | $ | -10.01% | |
| | 110 | | $ | +0.39% | |
| | 111 | | $ | -6.64% | |
| | 112 | | $ | -6.02% | |
| | 113 | | $ | -2.49% | |
| | 114 | | $ | +1.50% | |
| | 115 | | $ | +0.00% | |
| | 116 | | $ | --% | |
| | 117 | | $ | +0.11% | |
| | 118 | | $ | -2.74% | |
| | 119 | | $ | -6.13% | |
| | 120 | | $ | -6.09% | |
| | 121 | | $ | -9.49% | |
| | 122 | | $ | -3.10% | |
| | 123 | | $ | -5.33% | |
| | 124 | | $ | -7.57% | |
| | 125 | | $ | +5.73% | |
| | 126 | | $ | -5.46% | |
| | 127 | | $ | -2.99% | |
| | 128 | | $ | +4.30% | |
| | 129 | | $ | -3.14% | |
| | 130 | | $ | -3.48% | |
| | 131 | | $ | --% | |
| | 132 | | $ | --% | |
| | 133 | | $ | --% | |
| | 134 | | $ | --% | |
| | 135 | | $ | --% | |
| | 136 | | $ | --% | |
| | 137 | | $ | --% | |
| | 138 | | $ | --% | |
| | 139 | | $ | --% | |
| | 140 | | $ | --% | |
| | 141 | | $ | --% | |
| | 142 | | $ | --% | |
| | 143 | | $ | --% | |
| | 144 | | $ | --% | |
| | 145 | | $ | --% | |
| | 146 | | $ | --% | |
Trending US-based coins
| Coins | Price | 24h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | -4.65% |
| | | $ | -2.93% |
| | | $ | -0.70% |
| | | $ | -3.54% |
| | | $ | -1.87% |
Top gainers
| Coins | | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | +1.34% | ||
| | | $ | +0.93% | ||
| | | $ | +0.73% | ||
| | | $ | +0.48% | ||
| | | $ | +0.41% | ||
| All gainers | |||||
What Are US-Based Coins?
US-based coins are cryptocurrencies launched, headquartered, or primarily operated by teams inside the United States and that generally aim to comply with US securities, commodities, and money-transmission laws. They attract institutional capital, bank partnerships, and ETF inclusion because of clearer regulatory talk-tracks and the deep US venture ecosystem.
Quick Facts
- Regulatory lens: Most issuers file or discuss SEC/CFTC positions, FinCEN registration, OFAC sanctions, and state MTL licences.
- Investor base: Heavy inflow from US VCs (a16z, Paradigm, Coinbase Ventures), hedge funds, and now spot-ETF buyers.
- Exchange access: First-class support on Coinbase, Kraken, Gemini; many are constituents of Grayscale, Bitwise, ProShares ETFs.
- Tech focus: Range from payments (XRP), smart-contract platforms (SOL, ADA), stablecoins (USDC), to oracle/infra plays (LINK).
- Jurisdictional edge: Being “on-shore” reduces custody risk for US institutions and simplifies auditor sign-off.
Top US-Based Coins to Watch
| Coin | HQ / Parent | Core Use-Case | US Compliance Highlight |
|---|---|---|---|
| XRP | Ripple Labs (San Francisco) | Cross-border settlement | MSB registration; ongoing SEC litigation for clarity. |
| SOL | Solana Foundation (San Francisco / Austin) | High-speed smart-contract L1 | Regular SEC correspondence; spot-ETF filings 2024. |
| USDC | Circle (Boston) | Dollar stablecoin | Monthly attestations by Grant Thornton; FinCEN registered. |
| DOGE | Dogecoin Foundation (Oregon) | Payments / tipping | No ICO; Commodity classification talk-track. |
| ADA | Input Output Global (Wyoming) | PoS smart-contract L1 | SEC no-action dialogue; voluntary disclosures. |
| LINK | Chainlink Labs (New York) | Decentralised oracles | CFTC tech advisory panels; no ICO resale issues. |
| LTC | Litecoin Foundation (Florida) | Silver-to-BTC payments | CFTC commodity label; no securities raise. |
| AVAX | Ava Labs (New York / Miami) | Subnet L1 platform | Reg D institutional sales; public transparency reports. |
| XLM | Stellar Development Foundation (San Francisco) | Remittances / tokenisation | Money transmitter licences in >45 states. |
| HBAR | Hedera Hashgraph LLC (Texas) | Enterprise hashgraph | Reg D SAFT + public coin list; GC member KYC’d. |
Advantages
- Regulatory clarity path – issuers proactively engage SEC/CFTC, reducing “black-swan” enforcement risk.
- Institutional on-ramps – Coinbase custody, spot ETFs, 401(k) crypto windows favour US-headquartered assets.
- Deep capital markets – access to NASDAQ-level VCs, investment banks, and auditor giants.
- Banking relationships – USDC, Signature, Silvergate (historically) provide fiat pipes.
- Tech talent pool – Silicon Valley, Boston, NYC, Austin ecosystems foster continuous upgrades.
Challenges
- Regulatory overhang – lawsuits (e.g., Ripple v. SEC) can drag on for years, creating headline volatility.
- Higher compliance cost – legal, audit, and state MTL fees make operations expensive vs offshore projects.
- Competition from abroad – EU MiCA, Dubai VARA, and Singapore MAS offer faster token clarity.
- Tax burden – US corporates face 21 % federal + state tax; offshore foundations often 0 %.
- Token dilution – employee stock/option plans must align with securities rules, increasing supply overhang.
How to Invest / Gain Exposure
- Spot ETFs – BITO (BTC), BITO ETH, ProShares SOL ETF (pending) provide 1099-B simplicity.
- Direct custody – Coinbase, Kraken, Gemini offer USD on-ramps with FDIC-pass-through.
- DAOs & treasuries – US-based DAOs prefer USDC, LINK, LTC for payroll to avoid OFAC risk.
- Equity proxy – buy Coinbase (COIN), MicroStrategy (MSTR), or RIOT for indirect US-crypto beta.
- Tax reporting – 8949 schedule D; most US tokens now feed directly into TurboTax/CoinTracker.
Future Outlook
- ETF floodgates – expect spot SOL, XRP, ADA ETFs once SEC lawsuits conclude.
- Banking integration – USDC settlement inside FedNow or future CBDC bridge.
- Clear commodity list – CFTC expected to publish final “white-list” of tokens outside SEC remit.
- On-shore DeFi – Aave, Uniswap Labs spin-ups that geofence but offer compliant front-ends.
- Bipartisan stablecoin bill – federal framework for USDC-style reserves, boosting on-shore stable dominance.
Final Thoughts
US-based coins give investors a “rule-of-law” wrapper inside the world’s deepest capital market—but they come with higher compliance costs and ongoing regulatory theatre. Treat them as large-cap, institution-friendly core holdings, yet still size positions according to litigation timelines and ETF approval odds.